Skip to main content
· 2/24/1922

Gilman v. Doak

Citations

  • 194 Ky. 21
  • 237 S.W. 1069
  • 1922 Ky. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plaintiffs plausibly alleged claims for injunctive relief based on a pattern or practice of unconstitutional stops and frisks by police
  • recognizing that “the Tort Immunity Act provides affirmative defenses”
  • explaining that a complaint need not make out a prima facie case of discrimination
  • explaining that a complaint need not make out a prima facie case of discrimination
  • refusing to dismiss negligent supervision claims based on § 2-201 immunity at the motion to dismiss stage
  • refusing to dismiss negligent supervision claims based on § 2-201 immunity at the motion to dismiss stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moorman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.