Gilman v. Cunningham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “in the ordinary course of things . . . . it is very possible that . . . a person sitting with another person in an inner tube riding down a curvy waterslide[ ] could have fallen off the tube” even if the waterpark had not been negligent
• “There is a presumption that the 56 highest and best use of the land is the existing use of the land.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).