· 5/16/2006
Gilman v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 48 Va. App. 236
- 629 S.E.2d 720
- 2006 Va. App. LEXIS 217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting appellees’ argument that district court had “inherent authority” to correct sentence at any time, explaining that the 1991 amendments to Rule 35 imposed an absolute seven-day time limit
- rejecting appellees’ argument that district court had “inherent authority” to correct sentence at any time, explaining that the 1991 amendments to Rule 35 imposed an absolute seven-day time limit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.