Skip to main content
· 3/16/2023

Gilman v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the district court was within its discretion when granting a plaintiff’s motion to amend after the close of testimony at trial
  • during personal injury trial alleging negligence, the trial court properly permitted the plaintiff to amend her complaint and allege damages of $50K rather than $25K

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.