Gillison Discount Building Materials, Inc. v. Talbot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of responding officers' county of employment \cannot serve as the exclusive proof that the crimes occurred in that county\
• holding that evidence of responding officers’ county of employment “cannot serve as the exclusive proof that the crimes occurred in that county”
• “[T]he fact that the responding officers were employed by the Coweta County Sheriff’s Department cannot serve as the exclusive proof that the crimes occurred in that county.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).