Gillis v. Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that use of pepper spray on another inmate does not of itself violate the rights of a neighboring inmate
• holding that use of pepper spray on another inmate does not of itself violate the rights of a neighboring inmate
• holding that use of pepper spray on another inmate does not of itself violate the rights of a neighboring inmate
• finding that coughing, choking, gagging, and burning eyes are merely the 12 “transitory effects of pepper spray” and not an actual injury
• finding the use of pepper spray permissible after inmate \refused to comply with orders to submit to standard handcuffing procedure and attempted to block a cell extraction team from entering his cell\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).