Gilliland v. Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting circumstantial evidence that an unknown vehicle contributed to the victim's injuries is sufficient to satisfy the \truth of the facts\ prong
• stating the issue in Gilliland was whether the witness’s testimony met the requirements of section 38-77-170(2)
• noting the witness requirement is a \safeguard\ enacted to prevent fraudulent claims
• “[T]he [witness’s] testimony ... contained circumstantial evidence that supports Petitioner’s testimony that an unknown driver contributed to her accident.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).