Gilliam v. United States Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that DOJ’s search was reasonably calculated to uncover all records 5 responsive to the FOIA request because DOJ represented how the search was conducted, including which databases were selected and how they were searched for responsive materials
• “[T]here can be little doubt that persons named in the documents [such as] . . . law enforcement agents . . . have a substantial privacy interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).