Gilliam v. 2201 Boardwalk Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the term “considered” “clearly invokes a broader spectrum of thought than the phrase ‘relied upon,’ which requires dependence on the information”
• It should be observed that the Lamonds court was construing Rule 26(b)(3). Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(b)(3) appears to have been adopted word for word by Rule 4:1(b)(3) as well as of other parts of the respective rule.
• applying rule to opinion work product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).