Gilley v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Money may be subject to seizure along with gambling devices, when the circumstances make it clearly apparent the money formed an integral part of the illegal gambling operation[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Collins v. Kentucky Lottery Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2012-10-12· cited 16×
• United States v. Harris Leveson, Jr., of $16,833.00
  Fifth Circuit· 1959-01-30· cited 15×
• LeGrande v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1973-05-04· cited 11×
• United States v. Three Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-Six Dollars
  D. Alaska· 1958-11-21· cited 8×
• Meader v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1962-05-18· cited 5×
• Milstead v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1957-10-24· cited 3×
• Fall v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2008-01-25

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Forte v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1936-04-06· cited 25×
• Davies v. Mills Novelty Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1934-03-27· cited 18×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1911-11-27· cited 18×
• Johnson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1934-06-08· cited 12×
• Gilley v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1950-03-17· cited 12×