Gillette v. Francois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that claimant’s behavior amounted to employment-related misconduct where offense was repeated following warning from employer, offense contravened company policy, and offense frightened coworkers
• “To be disqualified from benefits, an employee’s misconduct must be in substantial disregard of the employer’s interest, his disregard being either willful or culpably negligent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).