Gillespie v. Yell County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the Unruh Act, “proof of actual damages is not a prerequisite to recovery of statutory minimum damages”
• holding that “The express terms of the ADA hold a landlord liable for noncompliance” and that “a landlord has an independent obligation to comply with the ADA that may not be eliminated by contract”
• explaining that “[t]he 16 statute lists actual damages and statutory damages as two separate categories of damages that a 17 plaintiff may recover”
• noting that a DOJ technical assistance manual was cited along with other 17 evidence to support the plain meaning of the regulation
• explaining “[t]he 10 statute lists actual damages and statutory damages as two separate categories of damages that a 11 plaintiff may recover”
• “The incorporation of one statutory provision to the exclusion of another must be presumed intentional under the statutory canon of expressio unius.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).