Gillespie v. Pennsylvania Co.
Citations
- 272 Pa. 393
- 116 A. 540
- 1922 Pa. LEXIS 836
Syllabus
<p>Negligence — Affidavit of defense — Facts not denied admitted— Practice, G. P. — Act of May 11¡-, 1915, P. L. 1¡SS — Evidence—Damages — Contributory negligence.</p> <p>1. Under sections 6 and 13 of the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483, where no affidavit of defense has been filed to a statement of claim which avers injury or death by the negligent act of the defendant, the plaintiff need not prove whose negligence was the cause thereof, and defendant will not be permitted to contest that question; but the proofs must show that the injury or death resulted from actual negligence of the character averred in the statement of claim, that plaintiff was damnified by reason thereof, and the extent of his damage.</p> <p>2. Since the act does not deal with the subject of contributory negligence, all matters relating thereto, whether substantive or procedural, remain unaffected by its passage.</p>
Judges: Frazer, Kephart, Schapper, Simpson, Walling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Farbo v. CaskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-02-06· cited 27×
- Kirk v. Showell, Fryer & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1923-03-19· cited 20×
- Gurdus ex rel. Solnicki v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-02-13· cited 10×
- Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad v. Ford Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-03-06· cited 4×
- Falco v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1927-01-24
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.