Gillespie v. Lake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating a judgment disqualifying the appellant from participating in a welfare program when the disqualification expired after a year, which mooted the appeal through happenstance
• vacating a judgment disqualifying the appellant from participating in a welfare program when the disqualification expired after a year, which mooted the appeal through happenstance
• vacating a judgment disqualifying the appellant from participating in a welfare program “unnecessary and undesirable in that they foster uncertainty in the law and inappropriately serve to expand the jurisdiction of the court applying such exceptions.” Collins, 270 Ga. at 122-123 (3
• noting the “well-established but narrow exception to mootness for disputes that are ‘capable of repetition, yet evading review’” (quoting Fed. Election Comm. v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U. S. 449, 462 (II) (127 SCt 2652, 168 LE2d 329) (2007)
• noting the “well-established but narrow exception to mootness for disputes that are ‘capable of repetition, yet evading review’ ” (quoting Fed. Election Comm. v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U. S. 449, 462 (II) (127 SCt 2652, 168 LE2d 329) (2007)
• claims for declaratory and injunctive relief had become moot on appeal because the requested relief would have no effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).