Gillenwater v. Mid-American Bank & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that creditor was not required to foreclose on a mortgage securing a note, but instead creditor could first sue debtors on the note
• holding that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment against a debtor’s claim that the secured creditor sold collateral in a commercially unreasonable manner
• interpreting the Kansas statutory equivalent to General Statutes § 42a-9-207
• bank’s disposition of collateral was not conversion because exercise of dominion and control of collateral was authorized under the UCC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).