Gillen & Boney v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating placement in home confinement as changing an inmate’s “place of imprisonment”
• treating placement in home confinement as changing an inmate’s “place of imprisonment”
• treating placement in home confinement as changing an inmate’s “place of imprisonment”
• treating placement in home confinement as changing an inmate’s “place of imprisonment”
• district courts do not have the authority to change a prisoner’s place of confinement under the CARES Act and 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2)
• “the recently passed CARES Act permits the Director of the BOP to extend the period of home confinement permitted under § 3624(c)(2) (citing Pub. L. 116-136, § 12003(b)(2), 134 Stat. 281, 516 (2020)). Therefore, jurisdiction does not lie in under 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).