Gill v. North Shore Radiological Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring expert witnesses to possess sufficient “education, training, experience and familiarity” with the subject matter of their testimony
• original complaint properly amended three years after filing to include new party-plaintiff asserting a loss of consortium claim for the first time
• “words . . . ‘from the date of commencement of the action’ . . . are to be interpreted literally”
• G. L. c. 231, § 6B, to be “taken literally”
• the language of Section 6B is “to be taken literally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).