Skip to main content
· 6/23/1986

Gill v. Just

Citations

  • 121 A.D.2d 598
  • 504 N.Y.S.2d 36
  • 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]hen a general contract provision is in conflict with a specific one - the latter will generally be enforced”
  • “Defendant's failure to pay the GAT shortfall amount due under the contract constituted a default; consequently, under the provision for counsel fees in the event of a default, . . . MOSA's cause of action for counsel fees should not have been dismissed.”
  • “Defendant's failure to pay the GAT shortfall amount due under the contract constituted a default; consequently, under the provi- sion for counsel fees in the event of a default, . . . MOSA's cause of action for counsel fees should not have been dismissed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.