Gill v. Gill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a trial court may order sequestration of an incarcerated party's assets for purposes of securing payment of alimony, child support, or medical insurance for the parties' child
• no abuse of discretion to sequester former husband’s assets to ensure future payment of alimony, child support and medical insurance for the minor child
• assets properly sequestered for support payments which would come due during husband's incarceration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Held v. Held
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-14· cited 19×
• Cimitier v. Cimitier
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-26· cited 6×
• Cole v. Cole
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-13· cited 5×
• Vargas v. Vargas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-04
• Rochette v. Rochette
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-25

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Garland v. Garland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-02-18· cited 5×
• Stowers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-03-27· cited 3×