Skip to main content
· 7/3/2012

Gill v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 872 F. Supp. 2d 30
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91722
  • 2012 WL 2552733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing a claim that was filed ninety-two days after the plaintiff received an EEOC right- 10 to-sue letter
  • 3d Am. Compl. ¶ 21

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.