Gill v. Arkansas Employment Security Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a non-party debtor lacked standing to challenge the validity of an allegedly forged assignment
• because assignment of security deed was contractual, plaintiff lacked standing to contest its validity because he was not a party to the assignment
• plaintiff lacked standing to contest validity of assignment of note and security deed because assignment was a “contract between MERS and [loan servicing company]”
• plaintiff lacked standing to contest validity of assignment of note and security deed because assignment was a “contract between MERS and [loan servicing company]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).