Gilkey v. Schweitzer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The Daubert test should only be used to determine the admissibility of novel scientific evidence\
• evidentiary standards applicable to novel scientific evidence should not have been applied to preclude anesthesiologist's expert opinion that placement of catheter while patient was anesthetized increased risk of injury
• evidentiary standards applicable to novel scientific evidence should not have been applied to preclude anesthesiologist’s expert opinion that placement of catheter while patient was anesthetized increased risk of injury
• “Daubert is limited, to novel scientific evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).