Giles v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Tjhere is no magic in nomenclature. A document is to be construed by its substance or function, rather than by its name.”
• “[I]t is well established that there is no magic in nomenclature. A document is to be construed by its substance or function, rather than by its name.”
• written request of need for presence required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Daniel v. Allstate Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-04-10· cited 9×
• Seibert v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-10-22· cited 5×
• Schwindler v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-04-03· cited 4×
• SURH v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-01-25· cited 2×
• Jeffrey Bryan Birdsong v. Catherine Barnett
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-10-29
• Robert C. Beasley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-01-12
• Trenice Rhymer-Mayo v. Terrence Herrington
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-09-23
• Dante G. Fredrick v. Stanley Williams, Warden
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-12-17

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Paul v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-24· cited 48×
• Dolinger v. Driver
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-02-23· cited 45×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-01· cited 37×
• Helmeci v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-02· cited 29×
• Massey v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1995-07-10· cited 24×
• Ganny v. Ganny
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-05-18· cited 19×
• Hicks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-23· cited 12×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-06-18· cited 2×