Skip to main content

Giles v. Giles

Citations

  • 136 N.H. 540
  • 618 A.2d 286
  • 1992 N.H. LEXIS 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must [have been] prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation omitted)
  • “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must have been prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation and brackets omitted)
  • “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must [have been] prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation omitted)
  • “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must have been prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Others, Thayer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.