Skip to main content
· 4/28/2005

Giles v. Barnhart

Citations

  • 368 F. Supp. 2d 924
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding Rule 9(b) was satisfied where 20 plaintiffs alleged that the representation appeared on product 21 labeling throughout the class period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jarvey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.