Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Rea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to quash a government subpoena seeking names of nonparty clients of insurance broker noting that Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b
• noting that the party seeking discovery must demonstrate relevance
• noting, in the context of Rule 45, that courts consider factors such as relevance, need for the documents, breadth of the request, time period, and the particularity of the documents described
• status as a non-party is a factor that weighs against disclosure
• when assessing “undue burden” courts should consider such factors as relevance, the need of the party for the documents, the breadth of the document request, the time period covered by it, the particularity with which the documents are described, and the burden imposed
• considering untimely objections under Rule 45(d)(2)(B)(ii)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).