Gilda Industries, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Protection Bureau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that competitive harm would result where the agency identified 212 competitors and explained how the requested information could be used in combination with publicly available information to “disrupt supply, product lines, supply chains, and customers”
• holding that competitive harm would result where the agency identified 212 competitors and explained how the requested information could be used in combination with publicly available information to “disrupt supply, product lines, supply chains, and customers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).