Skip to main content

Gilchrist v. State

Citations

  • 565 S.E.2d 281
  • 350 S.C. 221
  • 2002 S.C. LEXIS 103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding strategic reasons do not save a deficient performance when no valid strategy is articulated
  • stating the witness's credibility was essential to the decision to convict because the witness's testimony was the only evidence of guilt
  • finding a PCR applicant was prejudiced by improper bolstering testimony because \believing [the bolstered witness] was the only way the jury could convict . . .\
  • finding a PCR applicant was prejudiced by improper bolstering testimony because \believing [the bolstered witness] was the only way the jury could convict . . . .\
  • finding counsel's failure to object to improper vouching for \the State's key witness\ was prejudicial when believing him \was the only way the jury could convict\ the defendant
  • Court will not uphold findings of PCR court if no probative evidence supports those findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Toal, Moore, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.