Gilchrist Timber v. ITT Rayonier, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the recipient of information is “responsible for investigating information that a reasonable person in the position of the recipient would be expected to investigate”
• holding that principles of comparative negligence apply in negligent misrepresentation cases and recipients of information are responsible for “investigating information that a reasonable person in the position of the recipient would be expected to investigate”
• “[In Besett,} we specifically adopted the Restatement of Torts’ position contained in sections 540 and 541 [.] ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).