Gilbraith v. Stewart Transp. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs had standing to pursue injunctive relief where they alleged an intention to purchase the products at issue in the future
• warning that, if lack of receipts dooms certification, “there would be no such thing as a consumer class action” in cases concerning false or deceptive labeling of small-value items
• finding that plaintiff’s claims under the CLRA and FAL accrued, and limitations period 22 began to run, when consumer purchased allegedly mislabeled iced tea
• certifying class of consumers who purchased iced tea with “natural” on label despite plaintiffs’ lack of proofs of purchase, finding self-identification sufficient for ascertainability
• certifying class of consumers who purchased iced tea with ''natural'' on label despite plaintiffs' lack of proofs of purchase, finding self-identification sufficient for ascertainability
• denying summary 17 judgment where plaintiffs did not produce receipts but provided sworn testimony about economic 18 harm suffered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).