Skip to main content
· 12/2/2013

Gilbertson v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 717
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 575
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3330
  • 571 U.S. 1085
  • 2013 WL 5876429
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the FDIC Extender Statute preempts the Texas Securities Act’s statute of repose
  • holding FDIC extender provision pre-empts state statutes of repose notwithstanding CTS
  • “Interpreting the statute as excluding repose periods from its ambit would circumvent that mandatory language by providing the FDIC with less than three years from the date of its appointment as receiver to bring claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.