Skip to main content
· 2/16/1993

Gilbert Yniques Angel Diaz Carl S. Ramos John Balderama Tony L. Hernandez v. Victor G. Cabral Mario G. Obledo

Citations

  • 985 F.2d 1031
  • 24 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1448
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1085
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2283
  • 1993 WL 34985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that 15 “section 1447(e) allows a district court, once it has permitted the joinder of a non-diverse party, 16 only to remand the case to state court…”
  • explaining that 15 “section 1447(e) allows a district court, once it has permitted the joinder of a non-diverse party, 16 only to remand the case to state court…”
  • noting “a district court’s erroneous reading 13 of the law” may constitute a mistake under 28 U.S.C. § 60(b)(1)
  • timely notice of appeal from denial of Rule 60(b) motion \sufficient only to secure jurisdiction over the denial of reconsideration\
  • “Section 1447(e) engineers a ‘departure’ from the analysis required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 in that it allows the joinder of a necessary non-diverse party and a subsequent remand to state court.”
  • “Section 1447(e) engineers a ‘departure’ from the analysis required by Fed. 9 R. Civ. P. 19 in that it allows the joinder of a necessary non-diverse party and a subsequent remand to state court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Schroeder, Poole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.