· 2/26/1990
Gilbert v. State of California
Citations
- 218 Cal. App. 3d 234
- 266 Cal. Rptr. 891
- 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ju-dicial notice of documents goes to authenticity and contents of documents, not to truth of their contents
- judicial notice of documents goes to authenticity and contents of documents, not to truth of their contents
- “California law does not recognize potential water use as a compensable property right.”
- water connections prohibited to preserve water supply
- water connections prohibited to preserve water supply
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.