Skip to main content
· 2/26/1990

Gilbert v. State of California

Citations

  • 218 Cal. App. 3d 234
  • 266 Cal. Rptr. 891
  • 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ju-dicial notice of documents goes to authenticity and contents of documents, not to truth of their contents
  • judicial notice of documents goes to authenticity and contents of documents, not to truth of their contents
  • “California law does not recognize potential water use as a compensable property right.”
  • water connections prohibited to preserve water supply
  • water connections prohibited to preserve water supply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.