Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of Fisheries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that perfection not required for regulation to be reasonable; court's task is simply to determine whether regulation is reasonably related to agency's statutory mandate
• concluding that agency policy limiting fishery before escapement goals were met was regulation because it modified commercial fishery limits
• concluding that agency policy limiting fishery before escapement goals were met was regulation because it modified commercial fishery limits
• stating that the statute or regulation in question \must be carefully drawn and designed for the least possible infringement on article VIII’s open access values\
• stating that the statute or regulation in question \must be carefully drawn and designed for the least possible infringement on article VIII's open access values\
• noting that \the Stepovak fishery is not similarly situated to the Chignik fishery\ and concluding that article VIII, section 17 \does not apply to this case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).