Gilbert v. State
Citations
- 58 Fla. 50
Syllabus
<p>1. Questions on cross-examination of a witness having no possibility of relevancy to the examination in chief may be excluded, even though they may tend to contradict him upon new and irrelevant matters brought out upon the cross-examination.</p> <p>2. Evidence on a trial for murd'er as to the merits of a controversy between the defendant and the Railroad Company, whose employee was killed, should not be received.</p> <p>3. The sufficiency of the evidence will not be considered, when the bill of exceptions does not contain a motion for a new trial.</p>
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 44×
- Baxley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-08-16· cited 15×
- Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. BevilleSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-11-22· cited 13×
- Andrew v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-06-15· cited 7×
- Hogwood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-06-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.