District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/16/2002
Gilbert v. State
Citations
- 805 So. 2d 70
- 2002 WL 53949
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a rule 3.800(a) motion that does not allege that the court records show the defendant's entitlement to additional jail credit is facially insufficient
- holding that a rule 3.800(a) motion that does not allege that the court records show the defendant's entitlement to additional jail credit is facially insufficient
- holding that a rule 3.800(a) motion that does not allege that the court records show the defendant’s entitlement to additional jail credit is facially insufficient
- holding that a rule 3.800(a) motion that does not allege that the court records show the defendant’s entitlement to additional jail credit is facially insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Reed v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-08· cited 15×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 2×
- Norman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-08· cited 1×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-20· cited 1×
- Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-15
- Garza v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-26
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.