Gilbert v. Sperbeck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that arbitration proceedings should be \fair and just\ and that Alaska policy favors arbitration
• holding AHRA claim waived where initial brief mentioned only ADA and reply brief made only \terse and superficial\ AHRA argument
• noting that we hold pro se litigants to less demanding standards
• applying witness immunity to testimony by expert witnesses, “if pertinent to the matter under inquiry” (citing Nizinski, 517 P.2d at 756)
• noting that we hold pro se litigants to less demanding standards
• applying witness immunity to testimony by expert witnesses, \if pertinent to the matter under inquiry\ (citing Nizinski, 517 P.2d at 756)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).