Gilbert v. Rothstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court erred by dismissing a complaint invoking ORS § 12.220 when the district court required the plaintiff to “conclusively establish that Defendants had actual notice within 60 days”
• applying OR. REV. STAT. § 12.220(1) and holding that § 1983 action was timely because the plaintiff filed a prior action within the statute of limitations of which defendants had notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).