· 10/11/1988
Gilbert v. Otterson
Citations
- 550 A.2d 550
- 379 Pa. Super. 481
- 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2971
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- informing customers of intention to terminate employment and start independent business without evidence of actual solicitation not improper
- recognizing Pennsylvania’s adoption of § 768
- recognizing Pennsylvania's adoption of S 768
- “To preclude the relevant testimony of a witness is a drastic step which should not be taken except for weighty reasons.”
- “A borrower who initiates an excessive interest rate and induces an uninformed lender to accept a rate higher than that permitted by statute will not be permitted to benefit by his own wrong by recovering treble damages.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Wieand, Sole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.