Gilbert v. Midland Funding, L.L.C.
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 5295
Syllabus
The relief requested by plaintiff-appellee in her class action is in substance a request to vacate the judgments of various Ohio municipal and county courts. The trial court, a court of common pleas, does not have jurisdiction to grant the relief requested by plaintiff-appellee. Therefore, because the trial court does not have jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff-appellee's class action, the trial court erred by granting plaintiff-appellee's motion for class certification.
Judges: Preston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-29· cited 621×
- Patton v. DiemerOhio Supreme Court· 1988-02-03· cited 420×
- Lingo v. StateOhio Supreme Court· 2014-03-25· cited 101×
- Santos v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court· 2004-01-21· cited 65×
- Judy v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-08· cited 24×
- Lingo v. StateOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-31· cited 11×
- Pomeroy v. SchwartzOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-07· cited 8×
- Thomas v. KramerOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-04-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.