Gilbert v. Hanlon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting voluntary departure disqualification to apply separately to each job was reasonable in light of statutory mechanism for separately crediting and charging the accounts of different employers
• interpreting voluntary departure disqualification to apply separately to each job was reasonable in light of statutory mechanism for separately crediting and charging the accounts of different employers
• statute stating that a claimant \'shall be disqualified for benefits . . . [f]or the week in which he or she has left work voluntarily without good cause'\ was ambiguous in factual situations involving multiple jobs
• statute stating that a claimant “ ‘shall be disqualified for benefits. . . [f]or the week in which he or she has left work voluntarily without good cause’ ” was ambiguous in factual situations involving multiple jobs
• benefits attributable to separate employer are disqualified separately
• benefits attributable to separate employer are disqualified separately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).