Ninth Circuit· 4/5/1985
Gilbert v. Dagrossa
Citations
- 756 F.2d 1455
- 56 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5567
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29914
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the United States is immune from suit unless it has expressly waived its sovereign immunity
- stating that the United States is immune from suit unless it has expressly waived its sovereign immunity and that “sovereign immunity cannot be avoided by naming officers and employees of the United States as defendants”
- suits against officers and employees of the United States in their official capacities are barred by sovereign immunity absent an explicit waiver
- “It has 2 long been the rule that the bar of sovereign immunity cannot be avoided by naming officers and 3 employees of the United States as defendants.”
- “It is well settled that the United States is a sovereign, and, as such, is immune 24 from suit unless it has expressly waived such immunity and consented to be sued.”
- “It is well settled that the United States is a sovereign, and, as such, is immune from 22 suit unless it has expressly waived such immunity and consented to be sued.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cook v. AVI Casino Enterprises, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-11-14· cited 118×
- Schowengerdt v. General Dynamics Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1987-07-30· cited 107×
- Orff v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2004-02-18· cited 46×
- Inslaw, Inc. v. United States (In Re Inslaw, Inc.)District of Columbia· 1987-07-31· cited 36×
- Bond v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2011-12-06· cited 28×
- Jama v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceD. New Jersey· 2004-11-10· cited 22×
- Bell v. RossottiM.D. Pennsylvania· 2002-09-30· cited 22×
- AL Otro Lado, Inc. v. NielsenS.D. California· 2018-08-20· cited 18×
- Ludtke v. United StatesD. Connecticut· 1999-12-20· cited 8×
- Multi Denominational Ministry of Cannabis & Rastafari, Inc. v. GonzalesN.D. California· 2007-02-02· cited 6×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1992-01-09· cited 5×
- Jones v. BassD. Wyoming· 2004-09-30· cited 4×
- Holly v. JewellN.D. California· 2016-07-11· cited 4×
- Lang v. RubinD. New Jersey· 1999-05-14· cited 3×
- Saucerman v. NortonNinth Circuit· 2002-11-19· cited 3×
- Langston v. Internal Revenue Serv. (In re Langston)E.D. California· 2019-03-27· cited 3×
- Dees v. California State University, HaywardN.D. California· 1998-12-10· cited 2×
- Martin v. ScottNinth Circuit· 2002-06-14· cited 2×
- Bell Consumers, Inc. v. LayW.D. Washington· 2002-03-28· cited 1×
- Nishibayashi v. EnglandD. Hawaii· 2005-01-19· cited 1×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 3,342×
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 3,198×
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,039×
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 1,701×
- United States v. KingSupreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,604×
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court· 1940-03-25· cited 510×
- Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court· 1952-03-03· cited 361×
- Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1980-02-20· cited 324×
- Gilbert v. DaGrossaNinth Circuit· 1985-04-05· cited 188×
- Beller v. MiddendorfNinth Circuit· 1980-10-23· cited 181×
- Hutchinson v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1982-05-26· cited 164×
- Ruby v. GilesSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 136×
- Max W. Forsythe, Helen H. Forsythe, E. Bush Hayden and Jean Mulliken v. D. H. OvermyerNinth Circuit· 1978-06-16· cited 103×
- Sage v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-05-19· cited 96×
- Michael G. Radin v. United States of America and National Mediation BoardFourth Circuit· 1983-01-27· cited 83×
- Sara Blackburn v. Guy L. Goodwin, and John J. Kearney, Lewis Cole v. Guy L. Goodwin, and John J. KearneySecond Circuit· 1979-09-10· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.