Gilbert v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that terms separated by the “disjunctive ‘or’” indicates that the terms are distinct
• holding supervisory relationship existed where defendant, as minor victim’s employer, had authority to hire and fire employees, create their work schedules, and direct their duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dunaway v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-07-15· cited 21×
• Sadler v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-12-27· cited 8×
• Dustin Clinton Delp v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2020-06-30
• Marcus C. Holman, s/k/a Marcus Cleophus Holman v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2023-04-18

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Muhammad v. Com.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2005-04-22· cited 379×
• Barr v. Town & Country Properties, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1990-09-21· cited 238×
• Hubbard v. Henrico Ltd. Partnership
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1998-02-27· cited 117×
• Shackleford v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2001-06-08· cited 109×
• Anderson v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1944-05-01· cited 102×
• Haskins v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-12-07· cited 96×
• Moyer v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-07-25· cited 90×
• Krampen v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-02-09· cited 36×
• Guda v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-02-17· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Diaz
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2003-09-12· cited 29×
• DeAmicis v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-02-01· cited 15×
• Chappelle v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-09-08· cited 13×