Gilbert v. Canada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where no warranty of estimate and where plaintiff told to rely on own estimate, no recovery for shortfall of 26.4%
• unexplained 25.4 percent variance between actual and estimated timber volumes did not establish government negligence, bad faith, or gross or unreasonable error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).