Gilbert Purze and Jerome Purze v. Village of Winthrop Harbor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that differences in the topography of two plats, including the presence of a ravine in one plat, justified the village bpard’s differing treatment of development plans
• holding, in a challenge to a zoning decision, that the plaintiff was not similarly situated to others who received - 17 - different treatment for different reasons
• explaining that other developments that were developed in different time periods under different circumstances were not similarly-situated to plaintiffs
• concluding that seeking different kinds of variances makes properties dissimilar
• explaining that projects which seek different types of variances are not similarly situated
• finding class of one claim failed where different board members considered zoning variance requests made over different time periods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).