Gilbert & Boswell, Inc. v. Gilbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that this Court “cannot affirm a trial court’s grant of summary judgment upon an argument that was never raised in support of the summary judgment motion”
• noting Superior Court has ability to affirm decision on any grounds supported by record
• noting Superior Court has ability to affirm decision on any grounds supported by record
• reversing summary judgment where there -4- J-A24037-19 was evidence that defendant supervised plaintiff’s work, but was also evidence that other company that paid plaintiff was required by contract to provide all supervision of plaintiff’s work
• “[S]ince we cannot examine the underlying contract between the owner and Geppert Brothers, we cannot determine the fourth McDonald element: whether, at the time Mr. Shamis was hurt, he was engaging in work that was [p]art of [Geppert Brothers’] regular business [e]ntrusted to [M.L. Jones].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).