Gilardy v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the claim-preclusive impact of a federal 24 judgment is a question of federal law
• \[W]e will invoke the [artful pleading] doctrine 'only in exceptional circumstances as it raises difficult issues of state and federal relationships and often yields unsatisfactory results.' \ (citation omitted)
• Moitie is limited to context of removal of state claims precluded by res judicata effect of a federal judgment
• “A suit may be removed to federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) only if it could have been brought there originally.”
• federal 20 “jurisdiction is lacking even if a defense is alleged to be based exclusively on federal law”
• federal 19 “jurisdiction is lacking even if a defense is alleged to be based exclusively on federal law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).