Gil v. VORTEX, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defendant’s direct threat defense “simply has no place in a motion to dismiss”
• stating that, in a disability discrimination case under the ADA, defendant’s “direct threat” affirmative defense “simply has no place in a motion to dismiss”
• chronological proximity alone cannot establish causation where “there are no facts (other than timing) alleged from which an inference of a discriminatory animus could be drawn”
• “The court is also confident that the Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) would apply the same revised standard in interpreting the term disability for purposes of Chapter 151B.”
• “The court is also confident that the Supreme Judicial Court ... would apply the same revised standard in interpreting the term [handicap] for purposes of Chapter 151B.” (citing Dahill v. Police Dep’t of Boston, 434 Mass. 233,748 N.E.2d 956 (2001))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).