Gil v. Vogilano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[p]ro se litigants are not . . . excused from the requirement that they produce ‘highly convincing’ evidence to support a Rule 60(b) motion”
• noting that “a municipality’s duty to provide medical care to inmates is non-delegable and is not absolved by contracting with a third party to provide care.”
• noting that “[p]ro se litigants are not . . . excused from the requirement that they produce ‘highly convincing’ evidence to support a Rule 60(b) motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).