Gigliotti v. United Illuminating Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding deposition taken thirty-one days following a crime satisfied the freshness requirement
• “the fact that the contract contained references to insurance could not operate to exclude those portions if they were otherwise admissible and of probative value.”
• ‘the fact that the contract contained references to insurance could not operate to exclude those portions if they were otherwise admissible and of probative value.’
• \the fact that the contract contained references to insurance could not operate to exclude those portions if they were otherwise admissible and of probative value.\
• written state- ment is admissible as past recollection recorded only if ‘‘made at or about the time of the events’’
• landlord not statutory employer where claimant injured performing construction, not maintenance, work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).